[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ttylinux:7] [ttylinux] pathfinder
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: [ttylinux:7] [ttylinux] pathfinder
- From: Jeff Pohlmeyer <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:57:56 -0500
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 220.127.116.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected]
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SK8aAFeJcVcPWPX1HFOT+56JRpfNXcHDcbEDJV/R6UY=; b=G2zDHz0naGjLbUp44h2FQ59OmH0YQYv9GQ8OMXpJ9XPP/Uo9w/So3MnXxcShCJAzSs 7krUdO4CoV2csUfwxDrMZYWcp4FULuXVSYxBaIfE0+GVPpH4hoc5ZkFhIEGc33MnwoVB 7n60OtDpwAld6TEUBoVJ6rs+Rl8xf5i+4W/uE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PmWnxv7ExrYGYTr5i59fumx3Kt0wJHq/RrWxQ3ASfMm9eW29gfCUrH6imaz2tCQ2SF sa7pWtz1KNZghjukMZMMMADzqFEGJdwrcKxVi4xj9WlXyV92oB+tgUd7S2hL+0rp5A5W lOofKA26hiOJnKz5qltf1Oz2eDon9NiNcf4nI=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
The name "ptylinux" sounds fine by me, but I wonder how this will
affect the future of ttylinux itself?
Does this mean you are giving up on the basic philosophy of ttylinux,
in favor of more bells and whistles? Or have you found the time and
resources to maintain two separate distributions?
I'm not trying to sound critical, I imagine there is a fine line between
staying true to the core ideals and still holding some level of freshness
and excitement. So I'm all in favor of branching out in new directions if
that's what it takes to keep things interesting.
For my 2c, one thing I'd like to see is a separation of the cross-tools and
the distribution itself. The cross-tools seem like they could become quite
useful as a general-purpose environment for cross compiling. And likewise,
ttylinux might even be built natively without them.